Students learn best from content that helps them understand and change the world

This post was originally shared in an email on February 19, 2021. If you would like to receive my next email update, you can sign up here.

Last week I shared the second video from the Rethinking Intervention series, built around the big takeaway that what teachers expect of their students shapes what students expect of themselves. Thanks to those who shared it and who offered me their feedback and reactions.

This week I am excited to present our video on Takeaway 3: Students engage and learn best from work that is challenging, relevant to their lives, and helps them understand and impact the world. Here is a reflection and discussion guide that can support conversations in faculty meetings, PLCs, or team discussions.

Across the conversations, there was a clear and consistent theme about how much content matters, but within the theme we heard multiple important ideas about what qualifies as “quality” content. This video explores the many things that matter to the content we teach, which means it will feel different from the first two.

(Okay, watch the video before you read further!)

My four-year-old has two career ambitions (this week): To work in a dinosaur museum and to build a machine that stops glaciers from melting. I have been thinking about what kind of K–12 education would prepare him to pursue paths to these jobs in 2034, the year he will graduate from high school.

I find it so hard to imagine what the world will be like in 2034 that I am tempted by simple answers like “the core fundamentals will still be important,” because he will need to read, write, and reason. Or, “he will need to know how to keep learning,” because building curiosity, research skills, and the courage to try new things matters more than any set of content. But to be ready to contribute, I know he will also need a solid foundation for the range of knowledge, technologies, processes, and leading issues he will be navigating. What content will prepare him for that purpose?

As I engaged in conversations with our Rethinking Intervention contributors, I was struck by how much consensus there is that content matters, but also by how many different factors need to shape both the content we teach and the way we teach it. We can know that challenge matters, that helping students be critical consumers of content matters, that knowledge matters, and that relevance to students’ lives and the world matters. Making decisions about how to honor that in curriculum and instruction can feel like it pulls in different directions and runs counter to some of what we learned in teacher preparation.

To name a few of the questions I hear educators wrestle with as they navigate content choices:

  • Should I be building knowledge about a common set of facts or making sure content honors the unique identity and culture of individual students? (And how does this relate to what I learned in teacher prep about Bloom’s Taxonomy? Shouldn’t I be aiming higher than knowledge?)
  • Should I be challenging students with problems that are hard or spending time attending to foundational knowledge and skills to access the question? (And how do I square this with what I learned in teacher prep about the zone of proximal development?)
  • Should I be building knowledge or building student agency in their learning to critique that knowledge? (And how should I think about my role generally? Should I be aiming to be a sage on a stage or a guide on the side?)

Preparing children for a complicated world is complicated work. I walked away from these conversations feeling like our job as educators and parents needs to be attending to the range of experiences that will prepare students; we need to center content that does many things at the same time. Content can both build a common knowledge base of a world beyond our own and ensure sure students can all see themselves in the content that is presented to them. We can give children foundational knowledge without removing the challenge. We can both build understanding of how the world works while also helping students learn to critique the information they are getting and change the world.

As we design schooling to prepare my dinosaur- and iceberg-loving little man and his classmates to be ready to be the change, these conversations made me want to ensure that, if nothing else, the content they engage with does three things:

  • Challenges them. (The image of a young Bill McCallum crying over a math problem, and his mother’s respect for his request to let him keep crying, gave me a new role model for mom-ing.)
  • Builds a broad understanding of the world while also helping students see their role in the world. (Dr. Muhammad’s amazing research on Black literary societies created a new model for how I want to help my son understand Black history, and his own history.)
  • Develops their knowledge of the world and their ability to discover and critique it. (The way Tiffany Neill used a cup as a teaching moment gave me a new understanding of how scientific thinking can live in everyday conversations.)

If this year has shown us anything, it is that our children will have some big challenges to navigate as they lead our country forward. The content we focus on in school needs to prepare them for a complicated future. These conversations taught me that we need to embrace the multiple factors at play if we want to do that job well.

As leaders think about how to use time, energy, and money wisely, here are some actions this takeaway points toward:

  • Create a vision of effective instruction that includes challenge, relevance, and knowledge-building. Give feedback to teachers on whether instruction meets that vision.
  • Make sure teachers have a solid set of materials they can use as the starting point and a lot of support as they learn to use those materials well.
  • Make sure materials provide both windows and mirrors, building understanding of a broader world and making sure students see themselves in what they are learning.
  • Attend to the role that knowledge plays, particularly in reading. Be suspicious of skills-only literacy instruction, and think about the role of knowledge in core instruction and in intervention.
  • Examine course offerings for challenge and for relevance to career pathways. Find ways to give students access to courses virtually that cannot be able to offer locally.

Here are a few resources relevant to this takeaway:

  • The Curriculum Support Guide offers a straightforward example of what systems can do to improve instruction and student learning by selecting, launching, and supporting the implementation of high-quality curriculum.
  • Our team compiled a list of some of our favorite content-specific resources that we’ve used with partners this year.
  • Dr. Gholdy Muhammad spoke to EdWeek about her book, Cultivating Genius: An Equity Framework for Culturally and Historically Responsive Literacy.

What else would you add? I’d love to hear your thoughts by email or through our social channels using #rethinking intervention.

Coming next week is Takeaway 4: Moving forward into new content with support will advance learning more than stopping and going back.

One step at a time, together,

Emily

Instruction Partners CEO, former AssistCommish for TDOE, library lover, Sunday afternoon chef and head of the Jan, Owen and Liam fan club.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store